Compare Novak to King & Smith and/or McDonagh & Nackenoff in terms of their respective characterizations of the development of American state.

Compare Novak to King & Smith and/or McDonagh & Nackenoff in terms of their respective characterizations of the development of American state.Are these characterizations complementary or contradictory? How might their respective disciplines help us understand these characterizations?You must cite all information from a source (whether in the form of a quotation, paraphrase, or summary) using either parenthetical citations and references as detailed in the APA format. Write for an imagined audience not familiar with the key terms and concepts.

RECENT ASSIGNMENT